Ebrius Disputatios

I know, I know, we'll never use them but they're really pretty, aren't they? Which monster would want to ban these babies? Give the gun grabbers an inch and one could end up, six feet underground. Just saying. Enjoy.

One of America’s biggest names in firearms reconnects to its roots with a new lever-action rifle platform in several fast-handling, visually appealing models. Initially chambered for .44 Magnum, then .45 Colt, other centerfires—even a rimfire—are said to be on the way.

How is it, that only people like Trump, JFK, RFK, Reagan and a few others have assassination conspiracies on their heads? It would be baffling if no one else contemplates, that people who are for world government, people who are authoritarians, people who commit genocides, never get assassinated or if so, they rarely do.

How is it that only people who reject the mockingbird, so called, mainstream media outlets are the types that are sanctioned for the kill? It's only those types who question the military industrial complex, the federal reserve, the endless wars and the outlandish corruption in high places in governments? How is it that Macron in France, Starmer in the UK, Netanyahu in Palestine, the morons running Sweden, Finland, Ukraine and the Baltic states are spared the assassin's hand?

Isn't this question a legitimate one? Or is this just some mindless, violent hate speech from a white supremacists supreme? Are questions like this one, forbidden? Are they covered by the first amendment of the US Constitution, or are we still pretending that, that document is still the law of the US land? It is absurdly odd, that only dissidents of conventional narratives are the ones who get targeted for murder.

Faggots like these two, always seem to be devoid of assassination attempts, why is that? These two morons are bent on starting world war three but they're the untouchable ones.

According to emails from the Trump campaign there was reportedly, another assassination attempt on Donald Trump's life. The text of the alert reads like this:

ALERT FROM TRUMP

There were gunshots in my vicinity, but before rumors start spiraling out of control, I wanted you to hear this first: I AM SAFE AND WELL! Nothing will slow me down. I will NEVER SURRENDER! I will always love you for supporting me. Unity. Peace. Make America Great Again. May God bless you,

Donald J. Trump 45th President of the United States MAGA

According to several mockingbird media outlets, the suspect assassin, is one, Ryan Wesley Routh. Routh allegedly, used a scoped AK47, to take his shots and the rifle was allegedly found at the scene of the shooting. One can only speculate why the shooter ran away, leaving his weapon. Routh was reportedly, stopped on Highway 95, and presumably arrested.

The FBI has wrestled jurisdiction from the local authorities, therefore, corruption will be a factor in this investigation. Routh may be lucky if he can remain to stay alive, while in detention since it wouldn't be unheard of, for federal detainees, to end up dead of alleged suicides. We'll just have to wait and see.

Routh, who has a lengthy criminal record from North Carolina, frequently posted about politics and exclusively donated to Democratic candidates and causes dating back to 2019. There are reports that someone was trying to kill Donald Trump as he shot a round of golf on a golf course. They’re saying someone stashed an AK-47 in the bushes and started shooting at Trump.

Somehow I missed this story, about the Boeing Starliner craft, returning to Earth without its passengers. It is reported to have happened on the seventh of September, almost one week ago. It didn't show up in any of my RSS feeds or my social media haunts. I think I should now do a search and see if that report, is accurate. Apparently, the story seems correct, the spacecraft uncoupled from the International Space Station, (ISS), on the sixth of September, and landed safely back to Earth, in New Mexico, on the seventh.

It has been a public relations nightmare for the Boeing brand these last few years but Boeing's stock price doesn't seem to be suffering too much however. Boeing stock started it's downward spiral around the spring of 2019, from a high of $441 per share and has been declining ever since. The stock price, as of this writing, closed at $156.77. All things considered, they still seem to be a viable company, all things considered. One would have expected a closing price, to be at least one third of that. Which is what the company is probably really worth. Just saying. It's hard to have high hopes for Boeing or any other US company.

There was a time that the Military Industrial Complex firms, would make high profits, however, they've become complacent and the competition have outpaced them now. The Russians, Chinese, Iranians and North Koreans, seem to be out producing the western war mongers and out pacing them with innovation too as well. All doing so, on what relatively, could be surmised as being, relatively shoestring budgets by comparison.

The United States is thirty five, trillion dollars in the hole. The country would be better off dead with that kind of debt. One imagines that the government could confiscate every US resident's assets and would be hard pressed to come up with a quarter of that sum. No wonder the elitists deep state scum, in Washington, want the country nuked into rubble. The US brain trust, is too busy replacing white people with third world rabble, too busy turning little boys into girls and too busy murdering unborn babies.

The elitists are so busy wrecking the US society, that NASA has been relying on the Russians along with Elon Musk, to ferry their astronauts and cargo, in and out of space. Many people may not be studious historians but one doesn't have to be to realize, that the behavior of western politicians, are showing us glimpses, of how past civilizations came to mysterious ends.

Boeing's troubled Starliner capsule is returning to Earth without its crew after undocking from the International Space Station on Friday to close out a disappointed test flight marred by helium leaks and thruster issues. SpaceX will retrieve the astronauts in February 2025.

Originally published by Giube Rosse News.

Ukraine's downfall was its dependence on NATO, believing it was really the invincible power it boasted of being. Of course, this allowed her leadership to become richer, and widespread corruption at all levels favored not only the accumulation of great fortunes, but also a broader redistribution of income. However, in collective and national terms, this choice of course has been fatal.

The economic, social and demographic devastation is so evident that it is not even worth discussing. Less evident, however, is the detrimental effect that military subordination has had, that is, the imposition on Kiev's armed forces of a strategic, operational and tactical model based on that of NATO, for which they were not only unprepared (and inadequate), but it also turned out to be dangerously wrong.

It has already been said many times, American military doctrine, and therefore Western military doctrine in general, continues to be based on certain conceptual pillars that are no longer reflected in reality.

The first of these pillars is the idea of one's own absolute technological supremacy, which should guarantee in itself an indisputable dominance.

The second is, consequently, the ability to inflict decisive losses already in the first phase of a conflict.

The third, also consistent, is the belief that victory can be achieved quickly.

These three assumptions converge to outline a conflict model characterized by absolute asymmetry; Furthermore, it is no coincidence that the US strategic doctrine itself is based on the principle of preventing the emergence of a power with equivalent capabilities.

Furthermore, even in its assumptions, this doctrine has almost always proven to be strategically fallacious.

Probably the only case in which one can actually speak of complete success is the attack on Serbia; The objective was to snatch a piece of territory – Kosovo – to turn it into a subordinate state and, above all, to establish the largest American base in Europe (Camp Steel) in the heart of the Balkans. It can be said that both objectives have been fully achieved.

But in the case of many other conflicts, things have been different. In Afghanistan, this military doctrine could not be applied, and after twenty years there was a hasty withdrawal.

In Iraq, there was the rapid defeat of former friend Saddam, but the country was practically handed over to the implacable enemy, Iran.

The same thing happens with Libya: after overthrowing (and assassinating) Gaddafi, the country has been divided in two, and the pro western part is in chaos, while the other has allied itself with Russia.

Obviously, therefore, the first problem with the Ukrainian conflict is that the entire NATO apparatus – doctrinal, strategic, operational, tactical, organizational, logistical, even industrially... – was built on an asymmetric conflict model, while The one that opened on February 24, 2022 is for all intents and purposes a symmetrical conflict.

Although the balance of power, in absolute terms and with respect to Ukraine and the Russian Federation, is certainly favorable to the latter, it is undeniable that the quantity and quality of support offered to Kiev by the 36 NATO countries has absolutely balanced these relations. .

Of course, the US objective, in strategic terms, has always been to wear down Russia politically and militarily, not to defeat it on the ground (although, occasionally, someone in Washington has entertained this idea).

But when it became clear that the Ukrainian armed forces were not up to the task, NATO's qualitative involvement grew to the point of actually assuming strategic and operational command of the war.

A first critical aspect of this approach was the appearance of the difficulties inherent in the compatibility of NATO standards with the Soviet style standards in which the Ukrainian army was structured.

Obviously, Kiev's armed forces were structured according to an operational model similar to the Russian one, and derived from the times of the USSR. As the media of the Soviet era were destroyed and replaced by Western media, and at the same time the American command became more capillary and omnipresent, this contradiction became increasingly shocking.

Obviously, the NATO model has its own internal coherence: the organizational structure of the units, and the same type of means, are functional to the application of the Atlantic Alliance operational model. Applying this model, in parallel with a partial and progressive replacement of weapons systems, is not in itself a particularly simple matter; Doing so in the middle of a high intensity war is almost impossible.

A second critical aspect became evident with the arrival of Western media. Firstly, this raised a staff training problem, which was necessarily much more rushed than it should have been. And, of course, the problem of logistics also immediately arose, that is, the maintenance and repair of these means, for which the Ukrainian armed forces were not equipped.

But even more relevant, as a critical factor, was the great variety of weapons systems supplied, coming from various Western countries.

These systems, although in principle standardized according to a common NATO standard, in reality revealed a series of specificity's that further multiplied management problems [1]; For example, it turned out that artillery pieces of a certain caliber were not capable of using all the ammunition of the same caliber, which created procurement difficulties. And, of course, this complicated all the logistics even more.

Third, operational planning and tactical action. Here too, the adoption of NATO models, for which Ukrainian personnel were not (or only partially) trained, significantly affected the performance of Kiev's armed forces.

It should be noted that, for obvious reasons, the training of the Ukrainian military (about 60,000 soldiers) was relatively limited, and took place almost exclusively in European countries. If we take into account that the Ukrainian army now has about 600,000 to 700,000 men in the front line, and has permanently lost many more, we can see that the soldiers who have received NATO training are approximately 5% of the total. , and therefore completely insufficient.

And, furthermore, most of them have been trained in the use of specific weapons systems, and always in relatively small groups; What has been completely lacking, therefore, has been tactical operational training at the unit level, that is, the ability to maneuver on the ground.

All this has caused a mismatch between the planning of NATO commands and the real capacity of the Ukrainian armed forces.

But even more significant, as already mentioned, is the gap between NATO's war doctrine (asymmetric, rapid, attack focused) and a completely different reality on the ground.

The training countries also ended up realizing this, which, in fact – when debating the expansion of the European training mission – stressed the need to “adjust the exercises more to combat requirements, given the gap between the courses and the reality of the battlefield” [2].

In a document from the European External Action Service, EEAS, (the EU diplomatic service) cited in the same article, it is explicitly mentioned that “current training models are modeled after Western standards” [3], underlining the difference with the reality of the battlefield . Besides,

The fact that Ukrainians train with equipment, procedures and doctrines from Member States also creates discrepancies in the types of techniques and methods that soldiers know once they return to the battlefield [4].

We had a glaring example of this last year, when NATO commanders – also due to internal US political demands – pushed the Ukrainian army to launch an offensive in the southeast, preemptively filling it with Bradley and Leopard tanks (the Abrams were provided , but they were not allowed to be used at that time).

The operation, conceived precisely according to the NATO operational model, was carried out despite the fact that the preconditions for success were clearly lacking. In fact, on the one hand, the Russian forces had established a formidable fortified defensive line (the famous Surovikin line), articulated in depth into three successive levels; and on the other hand, the Ukrainian forces completely lacked two fundamental elements to develop this type of attack, namely, effective air and artillery support.

The result was, therefore, as was foreseeable, a complete failure, which was also paid dearly.

What we have seen in Kursk, in recent days, is in many ways similar. Although with two new elements.

The first, most obvious, is strategic: effectively breaking what until then had been a kind of undeclared taboo, NATO invaded Russian territory.

The second is tactical: this time the attack was carried out mainly using small DRG units, which, after easily overwhelming the border guards and recruits stationed in the territory, penetrated deeply along some axes.

Obviously, in this case the operation – unlike last year's – was tactically successful, at least temporarily.

However, apart from the aforementioned strategic political value, this maneuver is irrelevant from a military point of view. The damage inflicted on the Russian forces, apart from a certain number of prisoners captured in the first days, is absolutely minimal, while the price paid in men (about 6,000, between killed in combat and wounded in combat, in a few days) and means It is very high.

The attack did not serve to distract Russian troops in the Donbass, if that was the objective. And now the Ukrainian forces are at a crossroads: either they withdraw quickly, nullifying the political outcome of the attack, or they stay on the ground and let the Russian armed forces destroy them.

They are also applying their usual method of operation here: they face the Ukrainian forces in one sector, and use their air and artillery superiority to crush the enemy units.

And all this for a portion of territory that may even seem significant, if expressed in terms of square kilometers, but which totally loses its relevance not only when compared to the immense vastness of Russian territory, but also only considering its strategic value.

In fact, it is a predominantly forested area, with few towns; The most important center conquered by Ukrainian forces, in fact, Sudzha, had just over 6,000 inhabitants before the partial evacuation.

In all this, the strategic command of the Russian armed forces did not lose sight of the general panorama of the conflict, and in fact took advantage of the situation to focus – successfully – its efforts precisely on the schwerpunkt (decisive point) [5] of the conflict, namely, the Donbass.

In fact, it is there that the center of gravity of the conflict is located, and this for a whole series of reasons.

To begin with, just take a look at the maps to discover a first fundamental element: the battle line basically draws an arc from northeast to southwest, which is concave on the Ukrainian side and convex on the Russian side.

The Russian offensive push therefore naturally converges toward an ideal center of gravity, which lies just west of the Luhansk and Donetsk provinces. Looking at the map below, among other things, you can see that the largest concentrations of Russian forces are in the far southwest, protecting Crimea, and on the Donbass front.

This region – and this is another reason why it is a schwerpunkt – has a very high network of Ukrainian fortifications, and defensive lines centered on population centers, which Kiev has developed since 2014.

Beyond these, in the west direction there is practically nothing left, neither natural obstacles nor fortified defenses, until the Dnieper. Which, on the one hand, explains why the Russian advance has been so slow until now (the liberation of Bakhmut, for example, took practically a year) and, on the other, why it is now increasingly accelerating.

In fact, Ukraine's defensive depth has gradually eroded into a very thin line. In practice, there are now only a few bastions left, beyond which there is basically nothing. There is the strategic logistics center of Pokrovsk, now only a few kilometers from the advancing Russian forces, and further up the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk line (which has already been mentioned here several times in the past).

Therefore, the Ukrainian attack in the direction of Kursk, completely removed from the center of gravity of the battle line, ultimately simply stretched this line to the north.

This, in the abstract, could be an advantage for the Ukrainians, since being on the concave side of the line theoretically shortens supply lines, while for the Russians it is exactly the opposite.

But such an advantage would only occur if the proportions of forces were approximately balanced; In reality, the disparity of forces is considerable, especially in the strategic areas of artillery and air dominance, and therefore the Ukrainian army is simply not in a position to gain any significant advantage.

In conclusion, the Ukrainian attack on Russian territory is neither a diversionary maneuver (tactical operation) nor a significant offensive (strategic operation).

Returning, then, to the general panorama of the conflict, and the impact that NATO's strategic doctrine and operational model have on it, it is not daring to affirm once again that the influence of the Atlantic Alliance has been decidedly unfavorable for Ukraine, and not only – as is evident – on a more general level, having led to the destruction of the country, but also on a more specifically military level. In turn, this leads us to another key to interpreting current events, and what is looming on the horizon.

If, in fact, a Ukrainian defeat will clearly represent a political defeat for NATO as a whole, it will also represent a defeat for the Atlantic military model. American military power – naturally still very considerable – is however crumbling, perhaps even more faster than the power of the dollar.

The obvious Israeli defeat in Palestine, the inability to confront a small country like Yemen, the clear fear of confronting a regional power like Iran, are symptoms of the deep crisis that the military instrument of Western hegemony is going through.

An eventual defeat in Ukraine could be the decisive blow, capable of ending NATO's deterrent power, opening the way to a myriad of totally unmanageable conflicts.

At the moment, no genuine and serious reflection on all this seems to have been opened within the empire, so it is to be assumed that – at least in the short term – they will continue along the same path.

However, if not, they will do everything possible not to claim another defeat.

The EU is a parasite that needs to become extinct. So far the only host which the EU is killing, is its collective membership. The rest of the world must ensure, that the contagion doesn't spread. After over taxation, mass refugee invasion, oppressive green energy dictates and wastefully spending money on NATO's proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, the EU claims that it needs more money because they don't seem to be self aware enough to realize that they're the reason why the cupboard is allegedly empty. 

Mario Draghi, EU henchman for the organized crime network calling itself the EU, has listed all the reasons why the EU sucks so badly and he has brilliantly deduced, that everything can be cured, with just a bit more blood money that will be sucked right out of the veins of the EU working class. Draghi claims that the problems facing Europe are existential. However, he doesn't seem too interested in addressing the concerns of the productive people of the EU. Instead Draghi and the rest of the EU elitists, are more concerned about sucking the EU membership dry in order to keep raking in all that cash for EU politicians and bureaucrats.

Draghi spoke about Europe's falling population, its lack of a competitive edge and the dwindling of Europe's industrial base. All problems which have their genesis, in the European Union's Commission. Perhaps, all those billions of dollars spent in trying to destabilize the Russian Federation and fighting a proxy war in Ukraine, could have best been placed to fix the all the concerns allegedly plaguing the EU. How concerned will Draghi and the parasites of the EU be, when nuclear weapons start detonating? Is that a concern for the EU? Indeed, how much value will the Euro or the dollar have, when European and US cities, find themselves in over their heads, being targeted by nuclear weapons?

Indeed, why would anyone even bother to invest in the EU or the US any longer? They're not the future, they're the past. Turkey is the future, so is Russia, China, the Middle East and Eurasia. The collective west is bankrupt both in wealth and ideas. The men no longer have honor and they're mostly all, just feminized faggot homosexuals. They will deserve whatever fate that is applicable.

Mario Draghi has a scheme to enrich the EU bureaucratic elitists, at the expense of the working Europeans.

Indeed, one run, by the group which controls the Israeli lobbies. Trump in a recent speech, stated that the death penalty should be levied at anyone who dares to express, alleged antisemitic speech. Reagan in a debate before he became a US president, stated that he didn't mind mass immigration, he just wanted it done legally. Then he gave us amnesty. Trump says the same thing now too. Except now, he wants to give illegals green cards if the graduate from US institutions of higher learning, including Junior Colleges. He doesn't mind replacing Americans, not to mention white Americans, as long as it's all done legally. So, what's the difference between him and that Kamala bitch?

At least a Harris win will keep us patriots on our toes. Boomers and the other brain dead will give Trump passes when he fails to keep his word, in a manner that would cause them to revolt if a democrat were in the White House. If Harris wins it will be even more proof that the democrats have perfected election fraud since Biden didn't win in 2020 either. The silly cow, couldn't even win a primary, which is why the democrats just snuck her in as the heir apparent.

According to this article, from American Greatness, A Harris victory will make the US a one party state. It's a little too late for that. The US is a corrupt, Uniparty, organized crime entity.

In a classic case of being in a clown world, according to a New York Times article, behind a paywall I might add, titled, “Spy Chiefs Of The C.I.A. And MI6 Convene, On A Couch And For A Crowd.”, the CIA chief is reported to have said, that the C.I.A. was “very sharply focused” on the threat of Russian agents operating in Mexico, where there are reports that they are trying to encourage illegal migration into the United States, as a way to destabilize the country during a presidential election year.

So basically, the Russians, if this story is to be believed, are just helping out the democrats and the Biden-Harris regime to pursue their own destabilization of the USA plan then. If the Russians are indeed, encouraging illegal immigration into the US, that is obviously sanctioned by the democrat establishment and the Biden-Harris administration. So what's the problem? US elitists are so deranged and mediocre. Was that the worst thing that the CIA morons, could ascertain about the nefarious deeds of the alleged Russian agents? We're in trouble now!

On September 3, there was a heavy rocket attack on the Ukrainian city of Poltava, in which, according to Ukrainian reports, many soldiers were killed. But that is probably not the whole truth.

On September 3, the Russian army attacked a Ukrainian army training center in Poltava with two Iskander missiles. Western media such as Der Spiegel also reported many dead soldiers and that there was a lack of understanding in Ukraine as to how something like this could have happened.

However, there is probably much more to it, because the object hit was a radio communications school of the Ukrainian army, where the operators of radio-electronic warfare and drone pilots, who are so important today, are trained. Since this technology is mainly supplied from the West, it was immediately reported in Russia that not only soldiers but also many Western instructors were killed in the attack.

Swedish soldiers in particular are said to have been hit because Sweden wants to provide Ukraine with airborne radar, for which Ukrainian specialists have to be trained, which is supposedly done in the telecommunications school in Poltava. not only his resignation but also his retirement from politics Coincidence or not, on the evening of the same day, Swedish Foreign Minister Billström announced.

The Iskander Missile Attack Was A Decapitation Blow To Ukraine's Radioelectric Warfare.

The media pressure wave of this hit circled planet Earth several times and from the Kiev junta came inarticulate whining and understated reports of losses. So it was the usual pattern. We don't expect anything else.

Eyewitnesses described the reality. These are pictures of the paramedic Igor Tkachev of the volunteer battalion “Hospitaller”, who arrived at the scene before the ambulances and wrote about it: Further back everything was full of corpses, blood, screams, groans, pain and death. In front of us, there was a huge old truck into which the wounded were loaded. They were placed on rags, blankets, or doors, lifted over their heads and thrown in the back. I didn't even have time to see what was wrong with them. When I got there I was helping the last of the wounded. There was no room, the door was closed, and the truck drove across town to the hospital, packed with dying people.

And this is what he writes about what it looked like a little later: The doctors who arrived were young girls with long fingernails, screaming, shaking and not knowing what to do. We were loading seriously injured, dying people with no arms or legs into cars, and the girls were at a loss. They were completely disorganized. They weren't prepared for something like that. I didn't see what the State Emergency Service did except transport the wounded, most of them couldn't help, and I didn't see any first aid kits either.

Former Ukrainian diplomat Andrei Telishenko, who worked in the Ukrainian embassy in the USA, claims in an interview with RT that instructors from Great Britain, Sweden and France taught at the military communications institute in Poltava. Hence the excitement. We even saw planes from western Ukraine and Poland, especially Rzeszów, picking up bodies from all over Europe after the Russian attack. The losses amount to more than 600 military personnel, Telischenko said.

Other independent Ukrainian bloggers also mention this number of 600, sometimes even close to 700 losses. One thing is clear: the two Iskander missiles fired were precise and decapitated Ukraine's radio-electronic warfare system. This was carefully prepared and timed, to coincide with the morning departure and bypassed all air defense systems and jammers. The survey worked perfectly.

In addition to its devastating impact, this attack, also had a clearly demoralizing effect. Kiev military expert, Dmitry Snegirew said: The situation is simply catastrophic, in that electronic warfare, specialists are trained in this school. These are very specialized people, they're worth their weight in gold, in the Ukrainian Defense Forces.

British expert Alexander Mercouris seems to be even better informed, saying: There are speculations, that there were mainly drone pilots there. Perhaps, some were trained by Swedish instructors in the use of AWACS and other radars.

AWACS is an American flying radar for cooperation with combat aircraft. Ukraine is preparing to receive a similar Swedish system from SAAB, the ASC-890. It can stay in the air continuously for up to five hours, and the radar visibility radius is up to 500 kilometers, which should be of great help to the American F-16 in target determination. Then “bang!” Russian Iskanders flew to the Swedish trainers even before the flying SAAB radars arrived.

The symbolism of the site of the attack, Poltava, is mentioned by American Colonel Douglas MacGregor: Poltava was the scene of a truly gigantic battle in which Russia and Sweden fought for dominance in Eastern and Northeastern Europe. During World War II, Hitler's front command center was also located here. So the city has a symbolic meaning on many levels, and the real message is: We are coming, now you are finished.

Of course, the targeted attack on the telecommunications school in Poltava, although extremely important, is only part of the bigger picture of what is happening on the fronts. And our troops continue to advance.

According to the Defense Ministry's final summary for this week, the Center group liberated the following settlements: Skuchnoye, Karlovka, Zavetnoye, Zhuravka, Kalinovo and Novogrodovka. The Eastern Troop Group took control of Pretschistovka in the DNR.

However, Ukraine suffered the greatest losses, at least in terms of equipment, in the confrontation with the “North” group, whose area of responsibility includes the strip previously cut off from Russia, up to 14 kilometers deep and 40 kilometers across the front. Fierce trench warfare is taking place, in which the Banderists have lost 9 tanks and even 112 armored fighting vehicles since the beginning of the month and by the end of this week. And, most importantly, in just a week in this section 4 American multiple rocket launchers HIMARS. Each hit was confirmed by multiple sources.

Yes, the Kursk border area is a very painful issue for all of us. Above all, the uncertainty hurts, even though we are receiving information about the Nazi atrocities in the Kursk border area. And of course the commander in chief. But Putin must not lose sight of the overall goal of ending the conflict faster, on our terms and with minimal casualties. Consistency is fundamental here.

The topic of the Banderists' provocation in the Kursk region inevitably came up at the Eastern Economic Forum. Putin said: “The enemy's goal was to make us nervous, to agitate us so that we would move troops from one area to another and stop our offensive in key areas, primarily in Donbas, the liberation of which is our primary goal is.

Did that work or not? No, the opponent was unsuccessful. Firstly, our armed forces have stabilized the situation and begun to gradually push him out of the border areas. Second, and most importantly, there are no measures to contain our offensive. On the contrary, by moving its fairly large and well-trained units to these border areas, the enemy has weakened itself in key areas and our troops have accelerated their offensive operations.

It's been a long time since we had such territorial gains. The day before yesterday, for example, the East group conquered a triangle measuring seven by five kilometers in one fell swoop. The Center Group also operates very successfully in the Donetsk and Pokrovsk regions.

There, too, the terrain gains are no longer counted in hundreds of meters, but in square kilometers – four times five, three times five and so on. That's the second point and last but not least, the enemy suffers huge losses in personnel and material. And this threatens to break through the front in the most important areas, and the losses can simply lead to the loss of combat effectiveness of the entire armed forces, and that is what we want to achieve.”

I'm referring to reports in this article. This is why I'm on the fence in this election. I'm doing nothing. Trump or the moronic vice president, is of no consequence to me. I'm resigned to see the US, spiral out of control, taking a nose dive over the proverbial cliff. This is not our country anymore. Especially on the federal level. None of those people in the federal government have our best interest at heart. Voting for the alleged, lesser evil, is still a vote for evil. Sometimes, is best to just do nothing.

This story seems unbelievable. I thought, that the federal government was paying these replacement democrats, to buy food. Indeed, there are reports that many of these people have accommodations in hotels. Therefore, why is it credible, for them to be eating cats? The goose I can understand, they're just begging to be cooked. I'm not sure what the residents are up in arms about though, because from the look of the photo in the article, the neighborhood looks shitty.

This isn't our country anymore and unless we're willing to do what's necessary to have a livable society, we ought to just separate ourselves from the madness and watch it burn. Later, we can assess our options and see if what's left behind is worth our trouble.